-
PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT
EXAMPLE
The claimant was crossing a road in an 30 mph zone
where there were no facilities such a zebra markings or
pelican crossings etc.
It was a relatively busy residential street. After
looking both ways he began to cross and had almost
reached the opposite kerb when he was struck by a
vehicle coming from his left. The pedestrian was
literally 2 feet away from the kerb when the collision
occurred. He suffered a broken tibia and severe soft
tissue injuries in the accident and was immediately
rushed to hospital by ambulance.
The car driver alleged
the claimant "appeared from nowhere" and pleaded
innocence to the police who attended the scene. The fact
was, however, that the evidence at the scene revealed
the car driver could and should have spotted the
pedestrian who had walked almost the full width of the
road - had he been paying proper attention he would have
braked and avoided the collision.
He was cautioned for
driving without due care and attention.
The claimant was
detained in hospital overnight and then released with a
plaster cast and told to rest. The cast stayed on for 6
weeks and he was able to return to his work as a dustman
within 2 months. He called The Claims Connection for
advice on being able to
claim
compensation because he felt he should be entitled
to recompense for his losses.
We advised the claimant
that he had a very good claim because he had virtually
crossed the road when the accident occurred.
He would be
entitled to claim the following:
Pain and suffering
compensation
Treatment costs & physio costs
Loss of
earnings
Care and services whilst incapacitated
Call our FREE legal careline now on 0800 0322210
MOTORING LEGAL NEWS:
NEWS
Coroner questions some older drivers safety after an inquest to a fatal road accident
- 3rd June 2010
Pedestrian accidents would be cut if Bosch's night vision plus
system was installed in vehicles
- 20th November 2009
The EU wants all cars fitting with black box recorders
-
4th November 2009
Cristiano Ronaldo may struggle to get his car insured
after crashing his Ferrari -
5th March 2009
APIL are gathering statistics from injury lawyers to
expose the myth promoted by insurers that RTA (Road
Traffic Accident) claims are "simple" legal matters that
do not require legal representation - here's why the
insurers are WRONG! -
19th December 2008
brake road
safety -
rospa -
thatcham accident
research site
|