:: Home :: Business contact :: Feedback    
Header banner
HOW IT WORKS | WHY CHOOSE US | DID YOU KNOW? | GET IN TOUCH    

APIL accredited law practice logo

Why claim?
About No win No fee
Why our service?

Injury at work claims

Industrial disease compensation

 

 
Privacy policy     

 


 

Case study on compensation for occupational deafness

CASE STUDY 1

The claimant Mr R lived in Lincolnshire and worked as a general construction worker and plant operator. 

Mr R was exposed to high noise levels when operating plant such as mechanical diggers, and also when using powered hand tools such as stone saws and large drills.  Mr R’s employer failed to supply enough pairs of ear protectors for all of the workers that needed to use ear protectors, and also to provide health and safety information on using ear protectors. 

Mr R’s employer attempted to defend the claim, but the county court judge rejected the employers arguments as they had failed on a number of key noise at work legal elements and accepted Mr R’s claim that his employer had been in breach of the Noise at Work Regulations 1989. 

The claimant was paid £16000 compensation for the occupational hearing loss and tinnitus that he suffered.  

Read how you can measure or identify if you are at risk of suffering hearing problems at work

CASE STUDY 2

Mrs S had been employed as an assembly worker in a factory near Nottingham that had since closed, and her routine work had been assembling and fabricating metal cases. 

Mrs S had not been trained or instructed in how to properly use the ear protectors supplied by her employer that were a type of ear plug.  Also Mrs S’s employer had failed to carry out any type of checks to ensure that Mrs S’s hearing was not being damaged by the noise in the factory. 

Mrs S was paid £7500 compensation for the hearing loss and tinnitus that she had suffered by the insurers of the factory owner.                  

More - Do not underestimate the hazard of noise in the workplace.

Discrimination against deaf person who needed an assistance dog and was refused service in a restaurant received £1200 for injury and hurt feelings. The client in this case was refused food or service in a restaurant because he was accompanied by a dog specially trained to work with deaf people. The Disability Rights Commission took the case forward and won compensation for the injured party - 10th January 2009

NEWS 

Music teachers ordered to wear earmuffs - 5th March 2009. Teachers in the UK have been warned to wear earmuffs or stand behind noise screens to protect their hearing. This is apparently because beginners tend to thrash away and make far more noise than would otherwise be the case. The HSE have set levels for maximum daily exposure to sustained noise and the results may surprise people (particularly music teachers!)

More links:

Deafness research - British Deaf Association - HSE on noise induced hearing loss NIHL - ear protection information (HSE pdf) - MOD deafness claims

If your employer has failed to take steps to reduce excessive noise in your working environment or provide protective equipment such as ear defenders etc -  you may be entitled to make a claim.

MAKE AN ENQUIRY WITH US TODAY REGARDING YOUR POSSIBLE COMPENSATION CLAIM

 

Get in touch

mobile phone 

Call 0800 0322210

chat image

Or complete our form:

 


apil logo
Copyright ⓒ 2000 - 2009 Winston Solicitors LLP